Finibus

1

 

Here is the modified table with the correct linking according to the instructions provided: ```html
Chapter 1:
My dear Brutus,
Chapter 2:
philosophy altogether.
Chapter 3:
dissuade us from philosophy
Chapter 4:
Latin writings as such.
Chapter 5:
profess a contempt for Latin
Chapter 6:
Epicurus' Natural Philosophy is second-hand, modifying Democritus with worse results.
Chapter 7:
Epicurus lacks Logic: no definitions, divisions, rules, or methods.
Chapter 8:
Triarius criticizes Epicurus: no education, faulty pleasure doctrine, unoriginal ideas.
Chapter 9:
Epicurus claims pleasure as Chief Good, pain as Chief Evil.
Chapter 10:
Mistaken idea: rejecting pleasure, embracing pain, leading to rational consequences.
Chapter 11:
Pleasure includes pain removal, misunderstood by critics like Chrysippus.
Chapter 12:
Ultimate good is pleasure, absence of pain maximizes happiness.
Chapter 13:
Wisdom dispels ignorance, guides pleasure, and curbs destructive desires.
Chapter 14:
Temperance ensures peace by moderating desires and preventing excess.
Chapter 15:
Courage endures pain for pleasure, fears disrupt life’s balance.
Chapter 16:
Justice brings tranquility, prevents guilt, and ensures societal harmony.
Chapter 17:
Pleasure’s role in life clarified, mental pleasures outweigh bodily.
Chapter 18:
Epicurean life: wise, just, pleasant, free from mental disorders.
Chapter 19:
Epicurean wisdom triumphs over Stoic views, emphasizes nature and pleasure.
Chapter 20:
Friendship enhances pleasure, vital for happiness, praised by Epicurus.
Chapter 21:
Epicurean philosophy: clear, natural, education for happiness, dismisses unnecessary studies.

2

 

Here is the modified table with the correct linking according to the instructions provided: ```html
Chapter 1:
Philosophy should be conversational, not formal; Socrates criticized Sophists' methods.
Chapter 2:
Definition of terms is crucial; Epicurus misunderstood "pleasure" conceptually.
Chapter 3:
Epicurus misinterprets pleasure; recognizes grosser gratifications inconsistently.
Chapter 4:
Absence of pain isn't identical to pleasure; misconception persists.
Chapter 5:
Pleasure's definition varies; confusion stems from linguistic misunderstandings.
Chapter 6:
Continuous speeches preferred; dialectic and rhetoric's distinct philosophical roles.
Chapter 7:
Epicurus approves both static and kinetic pleasures, creating inconsistency.
Chapter 8:
Epicurus' definition allows unrestrained profligacy, misguides ethical behavior.
Chapter 9:
Epicurus' desires classification flawed; moderation fails to address vices.
Chapter 10:
Epicurus' pleasure concept inconsistent; fails to resolve logical contradictions.
Chapter 11:
Animals' instincts differ; humans seek preservation, integrity, and mental activity.
Chapter 12:
Reason, not senses, should decide pleasure and moral worth's authority.
Chapter 13:
Eliminate simple theories; man's purpose is thought and action.
Chapter 14:
Epicurus blends pleasure theories; virtue versus pleasure remains central debate.
Chapter 15:
Moral worth: inherently commendable, guiding actions beyond personal gain.
Chapter 16:
Epicurus values moral living; struggles with defining pleasure's role.
Chapter 17:
Hypocritical morality fails; cunning individuals manipulate systems for advantage.
Chapter 18:
Powerful individuals' unchecked actions; natural instinct can overrule corrupt reason.
Chapter 19:
Moderation tested in secrecy; genuine bravery surpasses calculated pleasure.
Chapter 20:
Thorius indulged in pleasures; virtue places Regulus above hedonism.
Chapter 21:
Pleasure lacks support from historical heroes; virtues serve public opinion.
Chapter 22:
Epicurus's teachings undermine true justice, morality, and genuine virtue.
Chapter 23:
Epicurean concept of pleasure is inconsistent and hard to uphold.
Chapter 24:
Epicureanism promotes superficial values; true virtue is intrinsically praiseworthy.
Chapter 25:
Epicurean principles conflict with genuine friendship and selfless actions.
Chapter 26:
Friendship based on utility alone is unstable and insincere.
Chapter 27:
Epicurean pursuit of happiness through pleasure undermines true philosophical goals.
Chapter 28:
Epicureanism's inconsistency: pleasure cannot guarantee true happiness or security.
Chapter 29:
Epicurus's pain management theory fails under real, prolonged suffering.
Chapter 30:
Epicurus's dying words contradict his philosophy; true duty transcends pleasure.
Chapter 31:
Epicurus's will contradicts his teachings; true philosophy seeks intrinsic good.
Chapter 32:
Wise Man always happy; pain not supreme evil; memory selective.
Chapter 33:
Mental pleasures surpass bodily; humans inherently pursue higher, intrinsic goods.
Chapter 34:
Humans possess higher purposes beyond pleasure; virtues indicate superior nature.
Chapter 35:
True virtue, not pleasure, leads to happiness; introspection reveals moral supremacy.

3

 

Here is the modified table with the correct linking according to the instructions provided: ```html
Chapter 3-1:
True virtue surpasses pleasure; pleasure dismissed for philosophical clarity.
Chapter 3-2:
Philosophical terminology evolves; Latin can express complex ideas effectively.
Chapter 3-3:
Cato and Cicero discuss virtue, terminology, and philosophical systems.
Chapter 3-4:
Cato distinguishes Stoic virtue from Pyrrho and Aristo's equality.
Chapter 3-5:
Stoics value self-preservation, reject pleasure as primary natural impulse.
Chapter 3-6:
Primary impulses guide appropriate actions, leading to rational choice.
Chapter 3-7:
Wisdom valued more than initial natural instincts; reason guides.
Chapter 3-8:
Stoics argue virtue as happiness; moral worth is good.
Chapter 3-9:
Mind-focused philosophies differ; Stoics prioritize virtue over pleasure.
Chapter 3-10:
Stoic Good defined by nature; emotions stem from false beliefs.
Chapter 3-11:
Moral Worth is intrinsically desirable, surpasses other goods significantly.
Chapter 3-12:
Philosophical terms made clear in Latin; vice opposite to virtue.
Chapter 3-13:
Stoics value wisdom over pain; happiness independent of external goods.
Chapter 3-14:
Virtue overshadows all bodily advantages; true value lies in propriety.
Chapter 3-15:
Stoics deny virtue's degrees but accept scope and expansion.
Chapter 3-16:
Intermediate goods are valued but don't define ultimate ends.
Chapter 3-17:
Preferred actions vary in reasons; fame, sometimes desired, remains neutral.
Chapter 3-18:
Wise actions are appropriate; value determined by rational choice.
Chapter 3-19:
Parental affection fosters community; nature binds humans together.
Chapter 3-20:
Social bonds and wisdom guide actions; living virtuously essential.
Chapter 3-21:
Friendship cultivated for its own sake; justice inherently valuable.
Chapter 3-22:
Natural Philosophy reveals the value of ancient wisdom and justice.

4

 

Here is the modified table with the correct linking according to the instructions provided: ```html
4 - 1:
"Understanding complex systems requires time, careful consideration, and patience."
4 - 2:
"Philosophers developed comprehensive doctrines; Zeno aligned with predecessors’ theories."
4 - 3:
"Peripatetics excelled in rhetoric, while Stoics lacked stylistic refinement."
4 - 4:
"Logic and Natural Science were well-developed; Stoics added little."
4 - 5:
"Natural Philosophy: Peripatetics detailed phenomena; Stoics less comprehensive."
4 - 6:
"Zeno’s End of Goods differed; Stoics’ interpretations varied distinctly."
4 - 7:
"Philosophers valued soul over body; virtues were thoroughly examined."
4 - 8:
"Query Zeno’s reasons for deviating from established philosophical doctrines."
4 - 9:
"Why is equating all sins problematic for public philosophy?"
4 - 10:
"Let’s compare your doctrine with superior doctrines, if agreeable."
4 - 11:
"How does morality become the Chief Good over natural needs?"
4 - 12:
"A pure intellect’s Chief Good must include bodily health."
4 - 13:
"Why ignore bodily needs if they contribute to happiness?"
4 - 14:
"Wisdom must perfect both mind and body for true happiness."
4 - 15:
"Virtue requires integrating all goods, not separating them."
4 - 16:
"Pyrrho's idea of virtue is flawed; Stoics' view of nature is flawed."
4 - 17:
"Moral Worth cannot solely define Good; nature’s role in virtue is essential."
4 - 18:
"Stoic syllogisms are flawed; their conclusions from false premises undermine their validity."
4 - 19:
"Stoic arguments are inconsistent; their conclusions contradict natural observations."
4 - 20:
"Stoics redefined terms but failed to address true values; traditional views are clearer."
4 - 21:
"Nature values things based on their importance and alignment with it."
4 - 22:
"Cato and Zeno share views but differ in terminology and presentation."
4 - 23:
"Stoics view virtue as progress, contrasting with earlier philosophical beliefs."
4 - 24:
"Progress in virtue improves one's life, contrary to rigid Stoic views."
4 - 25:
"Pride in defining the Chief Good leads to contradictions and difficulties."
4 - 26:
"Zeno's terminology changes do not impact the core values of Stoicism."
4 - 27:
"Equal transgressions analogy fails; context and nature of actions matter."
4 - 28:
"They claim all transgressions are equal, ignoring differing circumstances."
Here is the modified table with the correct linking according to the instructions provided: ```html
1:
Cicero's group strolls the Academy, reflecting on notable figures.
2:
Piso notes places evoke stronger emotions than mere readings.
3:
Quintus recalls Sophocles and Oedipus upon seeing Colonus village.
4:
Pomponius humorously acknowledges Epicurus, though he prefers living individuals.
5:
Cicero appreciates Athens's historic sites; Lucius is interested in them.
6:
Piso encourages Lucius to follow heroes and philosophy with enthusiasm.
7:
Piso suggests Lucius explore Old Academy's teachings and Aristotle's philosophy.
8:
Piso explains Peripatetic system’s educational value: nature, discourse, conduct.
9:
Peripatetics' chief good focus, philosophical writings differ in style.
10:
Debate on chief good: pleasure, pain, or natural desires.
5 - 11:
Self-love is directed towards oneself, not for external pleasures.
5 - 12:
Man’s nature: body and mind, mind is dominant over body.
5 - 13:
Mind's virtues: non-volitional talents and volitional virtues, like Prudence.
5 - 14:
Animals have virtues; humans' importance lies in the rational mind.
5 - 15:
Understanding nature: self-love reveals highest object of human desire.
5 - 16:
To know oneself, understand body and mind’s full employment.
5 - 17:
Body defects concealed; desire for bodily perfection indicates self-love.
5 - 18:
Nature's love of learning drives humans to seek knowledge.
5 - 19:
Archimedes, Aristophanes, and others pursued learning with intense dedication.
5 - 20:
Humans crave constant activity; idleness feels intolerable to us.
5 - 21:
Our nature inclines us toward activities like study and virtue.
5 - 22:
Moral worth is valued intrinsically, exemplified by virtue and integrity.
5 - 23:
Human solidarity, Justice, and virtue define moral worth and value.
5 - 24:
External goods support duty-based virtues, enhancing the Chief Good.
5 - 25:
Philosophical schools debate virtue, pleasure, and happiness inconsistently.
5 - 26:
Disagreements persist on virtue, happiness, and external influences.
5 - 27:
Consistency questioned in Stoic and Epicurean views on happiness.
5 - 28:
Debate centers on happiness and misfortunes, with logical inconsistencies.
Chapter 29:
Philosophy’s goal is happiness; many philosophers sought it.
Chapter 30:
Virtue outweighs all other goods; external things are eclipsed.
Chapter 31:
Virtue surpasses all goods; pain and pleasure are secondary.
Chapter 32:
Virtue makes every Wise Man happy, though happiness varies.
``` This table now includes the necessary links for each chapter, following your specifications. Let me know if there’s anything else you need!